Upstream Oil & Gas
Concept selection and front-end definition for onshore and offshore development concepts, gas processing, and LNG.

The front end of an oil and gas project is squeezed from both sides. Teams are pushed to reach sanction faster, and conventional studies only carry a few cases, none of which may be optimal.
Roebling holds the option space open. One model carries process, cost, and economics from first concept to a sanction-ready definition, in days, not months, with every number traced to a source anyone can audit.

Tim Lowery
Oil and Gas Industry Lead
“Upstream front-end work is selective omission, not false precision. You don’t need every process detail early — you need to know which ones don’t matter yet. What drives cost? What cascades if the reservoir is wrong? Nail the major levers, and you can run the scenarios that either advance the project or kill the marginal ones early.”
Previously


A new basis for front-end engineering
The full option space carried through concept selection, rather than the three cases the schedule allows.
Process, cost, and economics held on one basis, so a facility change moves capital intensity and NPV together.
Front-end definition completed before your estimating and project management teams are committed to a concept.
One Partner, from Concept to FID
Typical deliverables
Scoped to the decision at hand. Any of:
Technical definition
Concept definition
Basis of Design
Heat and material balance
PFDs
Equipment list and arrangement
Utility and flare loads
Major line sizing
P&IDs and equipment datasheets
Cost and economics
Capital cost estimate classed to the stage of study, with its basis of estimate
Operating cost build-up
Capital intensity in $/boe
NPV and IRR with sensitivities and P10/P50/P90 ranges
Concept trade-off and comparison cases
Project schedule
What customers say about Roebling
We value your privacy
We use cookies to improve site functionality. Some cookies help us understand how visitors use our site.
